MegaJournal: revisão de conceitos
Keywords:
Scientific communication, Journals, MegaJournalsAbstract
The MegaJournal presents as an option of journal’s model with high frequency of publication and simplified peer review, in a digital environment. However, this journal’s model is not disseminate, in Brazil, therefore it requires studies about concepts and practices. Thus, the aims of this work is to present the theme literature, through bibliographic records. Along these lines, the MegaJournal date from 2011 and may be a evolution of the open access online journals, on the other hand it can not allege that the theme is endorse, because further research regarding the theme are necessary, even if their primary characteristics already been established.
Downloads
References
BINFIELD, P. PLoS ONE and the rise of the Open Access MegaJournal. PLoS Biology, 2012. disponível em: <https://www.nii.ac.jp/sparc/en/event/2011/pdf/20120229_doc3_binfield.pdf>. Acesso em: 20 abr. 2018.
BJÖRK, Bo-Christer; CATANI, P. Peer review in megajournals compared with traditional scholarly journals: Does it make a difference?. Learned publishing, v. 29, n. 1, p. 9-12, 2016. Disponível em: <https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/
full/10.1002/leap.1007>. Acesso em: 19 abr. 2018.
______. Have the “mega-journals” reached the limits to growth?. PeerJ, v. 3, p.e981, 2015. Disponível em: <https://peerj.com/articles/981/>. Acesso em: 20 abr. 2018.
______. Evolution of the scholarly mega-journal, 2006–2017. PeerJ, v. 6, p.e4357, 2018.
BURNS, C. S. Characteristics of a megajournal: a bibliometric case study. J Inf Sci Theory Pract. Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information, v. 3, p. 16-30, 2015.
DOMNINA, T. N. A megajournal as a new type of scientific publication. Scientific and Technical Information Processing, v. 43, n. 4, p. 241-250, 2016. Disponível em: <https://link.springer.com/article/10.3103%2FS0147688216040079>. Acesso em: 22 abr. 2018.
FRANTSVÅG, J. E. The Mega-journals are coming!. ScieCom info. 2011. Disponível em: <https://munin.uit.no/handle/10037/3663>. Acesso em: 19 abr. 2018.
HARNAD, S. et al. The access/impact problem and the green and gold roads to open access. 2004. Disponível em:<http://ost.openum.ca/files/sites/132/2017/06/access_impact_problem.pdf>. Acesso em: 9 maio 2018.
HARTGERINK, C. H. J.; VAN ZELST, M. “As-you-go” instead of” after-the-fact”: A network approach to scholarly communication and evaluation. PeerJ Preprints, 2018.
HURD, J. M. The transformation of scientific communication: A model for 2020. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v.51, n. 14, p. 1279-1283, 2000. Disponível em: <https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/10974571%282000%299999%3A9999%3C%3A%3AAID-ASI1044%3E3.0.CO%3B2-1>. Acesso em: 22 abr. 2018.
KRIEGESKORTE, N. Open evaluation: a vision for entirely transparent post-publication peer review and rating for science. Frontiers in computational neuroscience, v. 6, p. 79, 2012.
LĂZĂROIU, G. Do mega-journals constitute the future of scholarly communication?. Educational Philosophy and Theory. 2017. Disponível em: <https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00131857.2017.1300022>. Acesso em: 19 abr. 2018. LÓPEZ-BORRULL, A. Megajournals, ¿hacia la posible fusión de revistas y repositorios?. Anuario ThinkEPI 2014, v. 8, p. 203-206, 2014. Disponível em: <http://eprints.rclis.org/23318/>. Acesso em: 18 abr. 2018.
PACKER, A. L. The online modus operandi and the advancement of Brazilian nursing journals. Acta pulista de enfermagem, v. 25, n. 2, 2012. Dsponível em: <http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S0103-21002012000200001&script=sci_arttext&tlng=es>. Acesso em: 16 abr. 2018.
PINFIELD, S.; WILLETT, P.; WAKELING, S. Open-access mega-journals. Cilip Update, 2017. Disponível em <http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/115022/1/CILIP%20Update%20for%20PW.pdf>. Acesso em: 18 abr. 2018.
SPEZI, V. et al. Open-Access mega-journals: The future of scholarly communication or academic dumping ground? A review. Journal of Documentation, v. 73, n. 2, p. 263-283, 2017. Disponível em: <https://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/full/10.1108/JD-06-2016-0082>. Acesso em: 16 abr. 2018.
_______. “Let the community decide”? The vision and reality of soundness-only peer review in open-access mega-journals. Journal of Documentation, v. 74, n.1, p. 137-161, 2018.
SHOPOVSKI, J.; MAROLOV, D. Why Academics Choose to Publish in a Mega-Journal. Journal of Education and Learning, v. 6, n. 4, 2017. Disponível em: <https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3032253>. Acesso em: 15 abr.
TREINTA, F. T. et al. Metodologia de pesquisa bibliográfica com a utilização de método multicritério de apoio à decisão. Production, v. 24, n. 3, p. 508-520, 2014. Disponível em: <http://www.scielo.br/pdf/prod/2013nahead/aop_prod0312.pdf>.
Acesso em: 21 abr. 2018.
WAKELING, S. et al. Transitioning from a Conventional to a ‘Mega’Journal: A Bibliometric Case Study of the Journal Medicine. Publications, v. 5, n. 2, p. 7, 2017. Disponível em: <http://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/5/2/7/htm>. Acesso em: 20 abr. 2018.
