Scientific Article Review Course, from ICMBio and Enap: a preliminary analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21452/abecmeeting2022.159Keywords:
Editorial process, training, scientific article reviewerAbstract
The journal Biodiversidade Brasileira, BioBrasil, has an 11-year trajectory as an instrument for communicating research results in biodiversity conservation. Seeking to increasingly qualify its employees, it developed the Scientific Article Evaluator course, certified by the National School of Public Administration, Enap. In this work, we reflect after nine months of offering the first class, about the first numbers about the course, such as the number of subscribers who obtained the certificate, total dropout, age group and gender of greater adhesion. It was possible to conclude that the course was successful, but that it is necessary to make a cut in the offer, better characterizing the target audience.
Downloads
References
FERREIRA, Manuel A.; CANELA, Renata; PINTO, Cláudia F. O processo editorial
nos periódicos e sugestões para a publicação. Revista de Gestão e Secretariado,
São Paulo, v. 5, n. 2, p. 01-22, mai./ago. 2014. https://doi.org/10.7769/gesec.v5i2.307
KNOWLES, Malcolm. Aprendizagem de resultados: uma abordagem prática para
aumentar a efetividade da educação corporativa. 1ª. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, 2009.
ROCHITTE, Carlos Eduardo; MESQUITA, Cláudio Tinoco. Quais as Características de uma Excelente Revisão de Artigos Científicos? Arq Bras Cardiol. 2018; 110(2):106-108.
VASCONCELLOS, Vinicius G. Editorial: Controle por pares e a função do revisor – premissas e orientações para uma avaliação consistente. Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal, Porto Alegre, vol. 3, n. 2, p. 437-458, mai./ago. 2017. https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v3i2.70
