Quantitavelly expliciting open peer review actions in the journal's editorial policy, considering preprints
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21452/abecmeeting2023.209Keywords:
open peer review, metrics, indicators, open science, preprintsAbstract
Open Peer Review (OPER) is one of the Open Science movements whose widespread adoption has faced great difficulties, both practical and conceptual in nature. In this work, we briefly discuss OPER, highlight its advantages, present the more than 100 possibilities for its adoption, and offer a quantitative, freely accessible tool, composed of hierarchically organized scored items, which allows editors to identify whether and how much OPER is present in the editorial policy of the journal they publish. Furthermore, the tool serves to guide a gradual opening of the process and could be useful for managers, indexers, and journal evaluation committees to establish progressive goals for the adoption of OPER among their criteria.
Downloads
References
Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002). Recuperado em Março 22, 2023, de https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read/.
MERZ, Martina. Embedding Digital Infrastructure in Epistemic Culture. In: Hine, Christine M. (ed.): New infrastructures for knowledge production: understanding E-science. Pennsylvania/US – United Kingdom: Idea Group, 2006.
MIEDEMA, Frank. Transition to Open Science, why and how. Zenodo, 2021 (outubro 13). Recu-perado em Março 22, 2023, de https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5576795.
NOBARANY, S., & BOOTH, K. S. (2015). Use of politeness strategies in signed open peer review. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(5), 1048–1064. Recu-perado em Março 22, 2023, de https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23229.
THREE-YEAR TRIAL SHOWS SUPPORT FOR RECOGNIZING PEER REVIEWERS (2019). Nature, 568 (7752), 275–275, 2019. Recuperado em Março 22, 2023, de https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-01162-1.
TRZESNIAK, Piotr; PANEPUCCI, Luciano Gabriel. Presença da revisão por pares aberta na política editorial de uma revista: critérios, métricas e ferramenta. BiblioCanto (aceito para publicação). 2023.
UNESCO. Recomendação da UNESCO sobre Ciência Aberta (Recomendation SC-PCB-SPP/2021/ OS/UROS). 2022. Recuperado em Março 12, 2023, de https://doi.org/10.54677/XFFX3334.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Piotr Trzesniak, Luciano Gabriel Panepucci
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
