Prospecting open peer review
the case of AtoZ: novas práticas em informação e conhecimento
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21452/abecmeeting2022.165Keywords:
Open peer review, Open science, Journal, Editorial policiesAbstract
It presents the prospecting action for open peer review to the journal AtoZ: novas práticas em informação e conhecimento. Two new actions are part of the editorial flow seeking to recognize the authors and reviewers opinion about open peer review process. The author needs to fill and send a nots and open science commitment form and the reviewer needs to respond to two questions regarded to open science about their consent on the openness level of the peer review process. The conclusion shows that those two new editorial policies allow to collect data and information that will support the editorial board to make decision about the peer review process.
Downloads
References
BALDWIN, M. In referees we trust? Physics Today, v. 70, n. 2, p. 44–49, 2017. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1063/PT.3.3463. Acesso em: 16 out. 2021.
DALTRO, Mônica Ramos; FARIA, Anna Amélia de. Relato de experiência: uma narrativa científica na pós-modernidade. Estudos e Pesquisas em Psicologia, v. 19, n. 1, p. 223–237, 4 jun. 2019. DOI 10.12957/epp.2019.43015. Disponível em: https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/revispsi/article/view/43015. Acesso em: 30 mar. 2021.
FYFE, Aileen. Peer review: not as old as you think. Times Higher Education Supplement, 25 jun. 2015. Disponível em: https://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/features/peer-review-not-old-you-might-think.
PEDRI, Patricia; ARAÚJO, Ronaldo F. Revisão por pares aberta. AtoZ: Novas Práticas em Informação e Conhecimento, v. 10, n. 1, 2021. DOI: 10.5380/atoz.v10i1.78747 Acesso em: 30 ago. 2022.
ROSS-HELLAUER, Tony. What is open peer review? A systematic review. F1000Research, v. 6, p. 588, 31 ago. 2017. DOI 10.12688/f1000research.11369.2. Disponível em: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5437951/. Acesso em: 31 ago. 2022.
SPIER R. The history of the peer-review process. Trends Biotechnol, v. 20, n. , p.: 357–358, 2002.
TENNANT, J. P. et al.. A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review. F1000Research, v. 6, p. 1151, 29 nov. 2017. DOI 10.12688/f1000research.12037.3. Disponível em: https://f1000research.com/articles/6-1151/v3. Acesso em: 16 out. 2021.
ZUCKERMAN, H.; MERTON, R. K. Patterns of Evaluation in Science: Institutionalisation, Structure and Functions of the Referee System. Minerva, v. 9, n. 1, p. 66–100, 1971. Disponível em: https://www.jstor.org/stable/41827004. Acesso em: 16 out. 2021.
